Hi Dawn, this post by Miles is making it more obvious he is working for someone. Again his obsession with finding Jews, and he is sure viruses exist which he has no paper for. He never mentions the Baileys who are the most popular Terrain people. He says nothing about the research except leaves a link, then goes on a rant about taxes. What is the point about making this post? If I was to make a post like that I would show research, what it said, and debunk it if I had proof like here: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-falls-for-fan-wu
This post more and more makes me think the strategy of his handlers is to give correct info about past AND FINISHED events, now come in for the kill with propaganda on the current ops. Really sorry for this.
Do you also believe that social media-prominent doctors and scientists such as Meryl Nass, Byram Bridle, Kevin McCairn, Kevin McKernan, James Lyons-Weiler, Ryan Cole, Richard M Fleming, Jessica Rose, William Makis, and Arkmedic, who assert that viruses exist, have "handlers"?
If they want to pretend fictional entities that have never even been found are real, that seriously calls into question their credibility.
Furthermore, germ theory (not just virology) is complete and utter fraud.
Anyone who knows their way around a research paper, can read a virology paper and determine it’s junk science, sans controls. Why don’t virologists use controls? Because controls instantly disprove virology.
Controlled opposition looks like all the names you mentioned and many more. Whether they are controlled opposition out of self interest, malicious intent or wilful ignorance, only they know the answer.
Yes but not to the degree that we think of handlers.
Clearly the Doctors are or have been indoctrinated in Capitalistic Allopathic Rockefeller Medicine and therein is your handler and everything that comes forth from it.
About MM I cant and didn't prove he has handlers, I said, "making it more obvious", that's only opinion (he can do top-class physics but cant read a virology paper?). On others, see my Deception Agents section in this post
But any intelligent person writing or talking about viruses and who would not be inquisitive to openly look at what the original research papers said and did on their claims of virus finding is leaving a big question.
I neither stated nor implied that you proved MM has handlers, so I'm not sure why you mentioned that.
Do you know for a fact that MM has not read whatever "virology paper" that you apparently believe is dispositive in this matter?
You didn't link to a post, as you indicated -- you linked to your entire archive.
Why do you assume that all of the docs and scientists that I listed have not looked into the claims of "there are no viruses"? Just because they toss the "no virus" theory into the same pile as, for example, the "flat earth" theory doesn't prove that they didn't understand the claims of those theories and decided to reject them as not convincing. Insinuating that their rejection of these theories is suspicious ("leaving a big question") or points to their having handlers is, frankly, sophomoric.
You opine that MM has "an obsession with finding Jews." You might find this whistleblowing review article interesting, as it claims that "[o]ne key facet of the Mossad infiltrated NIAID/NIH research was developing a defense to a weaponized coronavirus." Mossad scientists apparently believe that viruses exist! See here:
"COVID-19 and Illegal US Bioweapons Activity, an Insider's Revelations"
I honestly tried to answer your question. I'm sorry but I have other responsibilities and I can't do a deep dive with you.
1. I never said you said "proof" I am explaining my stance to clarify your word "believe".
2. I advised you to see the deception agent section. That's easier than explaining my ideas on everyone and anyone you listed.
3. I have asked many of the docs and related people to read the sars discovery paper, many noted in the deception agent section, they wont engage. My opinion is it is a question, you can disagree, but It's not really helpful for commentary discussion to call my opinions "sophomoric".
Thank you for your response. As you can see, I termed "sophomoric" your insinuation that rejection of the theory "there are no viruses" (by the doctors and researchers I mentioned) is suspicious or points to their having handlers. I did not term "sophomoric" your opinion that there is no such thing as a virus.
I will take the time in the next few days to read one or two of your posts in your "Deception Agents" section. If you have time in future, please let me know your response to the whistleblowing review article that I linked, above.
Perhaps you can understand that mistakenly or falsely accusing (or insinuating, hinting, or suggesting) someone as being a wilful "deception agent" is extremely damaging not only to that person's reputation, but also to the cause of waking up normies so that they don't in future fall for subsequent plandemics. As @Arkmedic has astutely opined, "Keep your focus. It was never about a virus anyway." https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/there-was-no-virus
Here, this is the shortest and easiest to grasp post that is reflective of the group of participants as a whole because that is what their common material says, though some points I pulled just from knowing some of their talking points
They are deeply in the space discussing virus, pandemic, vax, but none of them ever discuss if or how a sars virus was (not) found, it is just accepted in the narrative, and many I've contacted (some proof of which is on the other posts) will not discuss the seminal finding papers (Fan Wu etc). Some of them reply and those are in the other posts. My opinion, and that of others, is that this then becomes a deception (and they agents of deception), that is the reification fallacy of a virus existing and making XYZ phenomena (pandemic, ADE, variants, long covid, etc.), which leads to vaxing and away from the no-virus truth. That is the logic and there are proofs of what they say and write and react to being presented with the non-discovery documents. And the fact that no-sars virus has ever been found is abject proof as I and many others have spelled out here
Again I dont have time to write more than that, these posts take many hours each to write over many months-all unpaid (as opposed to the persons you noted usually all make considerable $ from their monetized work). You can also see Christine Massys FOIs and multiple discussion with Steve Kirsch, Mike Yeadon, Meryl Nass etc she has published on her site and SS.
Kirsch for example has an Early Treatment Fund, this fund has Donors and was admin by Rockefeller Philanthropy. Proofs are in here on his donors and reification of viruses that do not exist and a detailed examination of such that I debunked with the documents he himself was pushing:
The donors indicate who you are affiliated with and the narratives they are involved with, they are your handlers because they pay for your operation. This is not my imagination, though not all the deception people are kind enough to have a list of donors like Kirsch does.
If you don't like the word deception agent I can respect your opinion but our opinions can differ on that without further argument. Take care
Hi Dawn, this post by Miles is making it more obvious he is working for someone. Again his obsession with finding Jews, and he is sure viruses exist which he has no paper for. He never mentions the Baileys who are the most popular Terrain people. He says nothing about the research except leaves a link, then goes on a rant about taxes. What is the point about making this post? If I was to make a post like that I would show research, what it said, and debunk it if I had proof like here: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-falls-for-fan-wu
This post more and more makes me think the strategy of his handlers is to give correct info about past AND FINISHED events, now come in for the kill with propaganda on the current ops. Really sorry for this.
Do you also believe that social media-prominent doctors and scientists such as Meryl Nass, Byram Bridle, Kevin McCairn, Kevin McKernan, James Lyons-Weiler, Ryan Cole, Richard M Fleming, Jessica Rose, William Makis, and Arkmedic, who assert that viruses exist, have "handlers"?
If they want to pretend fictional entities that have never even been found are real, that seriously calls into question their credibility.
Furthermore, germ theory (not just virology) is complete and utter fraud.
Anyone who knows their way around a research paper, can read a virology paper and determine it’s junk science, sans controls. Why don’t virologists use controls? Because controls instantly disprove virology.
Controlled opposition looks like all the names you mentioned and many more. Whether they are controlled opposition out of self interest, malicious intent or wilful ignorance, only they know the answer.
Yes but not to the degree that we think of handlers.
Clearly the Doctors are or have been indoctrinated in Capitalistic Allopathic Rockefeller Medicine and therein is your handler and everything that comes forth from it.
"... and everything that comes forth from it."
Could you possibly be more vague?
Yes I could I have been more Vague, however....
The system of medicine Doctors have been indoctrinated into does not seek to cure or remedy.
Allopathy amounts to a business model.
Creating Markets (Sickness, Illness) to sell products (jabs, pharmaceuticals..etc) and services (testing, diagnostic, cosmetic -butchery- surgery...etc)
HEALth starts at the end of a fork and between your skull.
I eat my apple a day which was not said for no reason at all.
https://archive.org/details/rockefeller-medicine-men_202105
About MM I cant and didn't prove he has handlers, I said, "making it more obvious", that's only opinion (he can do top-class physics but cant read a virology paper?). On others, see my Deception Agents section in this post
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-tales-of-intrigue-and-ec6
But any intelligent person writing or talking about viruses and who would not be inquisitive to openly look at what the original research papers said and did on their claims of virus finding is leaving a big question.
I neither stated nor implied that you proved MM has handlers, so I'm not sure why you mentioned that.
Do you know for a fact that MM has not read whatever "virology paper" that you apparently believe is dispositive in this matter?
You didn't link to a post, as you indicated -- you linked to your entire archive.
Why do you assume that all of the docs and scientists that I listed have not looked into the claims of "there are no viruses"? Just because they toss the "no virus" theory into the same pile as, for example, the "flat earth" theory doesn't prove that they didn't understand the claims of those theories and decided to reject them as not convincing. Insinuating that their rejection of these theories is suspicious ("leaving a big question") or points to their having handlers is, frankly, sophomoric.
You opine that MM has "an obsession with finding Jews." You might find this whistleblowing review article interesting, as it claims that "[o]ne key facet of the Mossad infiltrated NIAID/NIH research was developing a defense to a weaponized coronavirus." Mossad scientists apparently believe that viruses exist! See here:
"COVID-19 and Illegal US Bioweapons Activity, an Insider's Revelations"
https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-and-illegal-us-bioweapons-activity-an-insiders-revelations-2432.pdf
I honestly tried to answer your question. I'm sorry but I have other responsibilities and I can't do a deep dive with you.
1. I never said you said "proof" I am explaining my stance to clarify your word "believe".
2. I advised you to see the deception agent section. That's easier than explaining my ideas on everyone and anyone you listed.
3. I have asked many of the docs and related people to read the sars discovery paper, many noted in the deception agent section, they wont engage. My opinion is it is a question, you can disagree, but It's not really helpful for commentary discussion to call my opinions "sophomoric".
I wish you well but I've gotta do other stuff.
Thank you for your response. As you can see, I termed "sophomoric" your insinuation that rejection of the theory "there are no viruses" (by the doctors and researchers I mentioned) is suspicious or points to their having handlers. I did not term "sophomoric" your opinion that there is no such thing as a virus.
I will take the time in the next few days to read one or two of your posts in your "Deception Agents" section. If you have time in future, please let me know your response to the whistleblowing review article that I linked, above.
Perhaps you can understand that mistakenly or falsely accusing (or insinuating, hinting, or suggesting) someone as being a wilful "deception agent" is extremely damaging not only to that person's reputation, but also to the cause of waking up normies so that they don't in future fall for subsequent plandemics. As @Arkmedic has astutely opined, "Keep your focus. It was never about a virus anyway." https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/there-was-no-virus
Here, this is the shortest and easiest to grasp post that is reflective of the group of participants as a whole because that is what their common material says, though some points I pulled just from knowing some of their talking points
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/propaganda-summit-season
They are deeply in the space discussing virus, pandemic, vax, but none of them ever discuss if or how a sars virus was (not) found, it is just accepted in the narrative, and many I've contacted (some proof of which is on the other posts) will not discuss the seminal finding papers (Fan Wu etc). Some of them reply and those are in the other posts. My opinion, and that of others, is that this then becomes a deception (and they agents of deception), that is the reification fallacy of a virus existing and making XYZ phenomena (pandemic, ADE, variants, long covid, etc.), which leads to vaxing and away from the no-virus truth. That is the logic and there are proofs of what they say and write and react to being presented with the non-discovery documents. And the fact that no-sars virus has ever been found is abject proof as I and many others have spelled out here
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-virus-rouse-going-going-gonzo
Again I dont have time to write more than that, these posts take many hours each to write over many months-all unpaid (as opposed to the persons you noted usually all make considerable $ from their monetized work). You can also see Christine Massys FOIs and multiple discussion with Steve Kirsch, Mike Yeadon, Meryl Nass etc she has published on her site and SS.
Kirsch for example has an Early Treatment Fund, this fund has Donors and was admin by Rockefeller Philanthropy. Proofs are in here on his donors and reification of viruses that do not exist and a detailed examination of such that I debunked with the documents he himself was pushing:
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/proton-magic-goes-virus-shopping
The donors indicate who you are affiliated with and the narratives they are involved with, they are your handlers because they pay for your operation. This is not my imagination, though not all the deception people are kind enough to have a list of donors like Kirsch does.
If you don't like the word deception agent I can respect your opinion but our opinions can differ on that without further argument. Take care
"Terrain Theory is a PsyOp: Trust me Bro Edition"